This most recent lecture as part of the new modes series, the student-run lecture and seminar series at Virginia Tech, was from Ahmed Belkhodja of Fala Atelier, an architecture firm in Porto, Portugal, a city and a firm which I just became aware, but was instantly intrigued.

This is the kind of architecture I would usually write off as a pretty object done by someone who would probably be classified better as an artist rather than an architect. But the minute I heard Ahmed classify their approach to architecture as naïve, I tuned in for a closer reading of their work. Finally, I felt like I was hearing a younger practitioner (running a very young practice) speak honestly rather than hyper-intellectually, about their approach to the discipline. Ahmed was quite honest about the firm’s reaction in their work to their roots in specific schools of architectural education.

He spoke only briefly on representation, but enough to make clear that the collages that they have become quite famous for are actually an integral part of their design process.

Theres a quote to be added here from Ahmed, about the incredible importance of collage to their process, as soon as I find it in the meeting recording, I dont want to misquote him.

He also said that for every project image we see, there were 200 others they threw in the trash. He also said that they view it as a real design tool, rather than a sketch. Whereas a sketch is finite, completed in one moment on one page, not to be changed, and rarely re-referenced, the collage as Fala sees it is a piece of continual iteration, a slightly different way of working, that produces a slightly different kind of architecture.

Along this same line of thought of the image as an integral part of the process, later in the seminar, one of the panelists, Tim Cox, asked Ahmed about the curation of Fala’s Instagram feed (and other social media). As I explored their feed for myself, a couple of key things stood out to me. First, they typically include no more than a number as a caption, and second, the feed, like their website, is non-chronological. This was intriguing to me because I felt it caused a more intense focus on their work and the details and thoughts that transcend the project and proceed through all the work. But to hear Ahmed answer this question by saying “ I don’t really know what’s traditional to post”, leads back to this main question of naïveté.

This idea, first introduced in a question which was a response to the practice’s own description of themselves on their website, and later brought up in a discussion prompted a great conversation about what it means to be naïve.

naïve in knowing how things are built

naïve in knowing whats traditional

naïve in regards to references

I felt like the word was used in the same way that no one can laugh at someone who can laugh at themselves. By embracing their naïveté, they are getting past it. And it is clear that in many ways they are actually quite sophisticated, as Prof. Joseph Bedford pointed out more eloquently than I can here. Maybe this self-depreciation is actually the best evidence of that. But if not, the hidden sophistication is clear in their work, and in every college and kitchen backsplash. In maybe a pure sense, it is an architecture full of humorous, but sophisticated moments.

Certainly, their website has a very sophisticated structure, I highly recommend exploring. Try starting here and clicking any image, you may be surprised at what happens. One of the best architecture websites I have ever seen.